Living documentation
Process designs, role matrix, functional and technical specifications for everything built. Delivered in editable format, not as a dead PDF.
We run SAP projects from blueprint to go-live using SAP Activate. From the proposal onwards you know which approach fits your case — Greenfield, Brownfield or selective transition — and what each one costs in time and money.
SAP ends mainstream maintenance for Business Suite 7 — which includes ECC 6.0 — on 31 December 2027. There is a paid extended maintenance window until 2030, but it costs more and does not solve the underlying problem: your ERP freezes while the market moves.
In practice, companies still running ECC need to choose a migration route now. A mid-sized S/4HANA project takes 9 to 18 months. Whoever leaves the decision to 2027 will hire consultancy at peak demand, at peak demand prices.
Our work starts before the project: we run an assessment that shows the real size of your technical debt — customisations, incompatible add-ons, master data quality — and turns it into three migration scenarios with timeline and cost.
All three routes lead to S/4HANA. What changes is what you carry along — and what that costs in time, risk and money.
| Greenfield | Brownfield | Selective Data Transition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | A new implementation, processes redesigned from scratch | Technical conversion of the current system, keeping customisations and history | Selective migration: brings only the companies, processes or years of data that matter |
| Right when | Current processes are the bottleneck, or there is no SAP today | Processes work and the goal is to modernise the platform | There is plenty worth keeping and plenty worth leaving behind |
| Typical timeline | 12 to 24 months | 8 to 14 months | 10 to 18 months |
| Main risk | Resistance to change and rewriting processes | Inheriting customisation and bad data nobody wanted to clean | Complexity of the data selection rules |
| Impact on operations | High: almost everything changes for the end user | Low to medium: the screen changes, the process usually does not | Medium: varies by area depending on the selection |
We follow SAP Activate. Each phase ends with a reviewed deliverable and formal sign-off — you are never left wondering where the project stands.
We inventory customisations, add-ons and integrations, run the SAP Readiness Check and measure master data quality. Output: a report with the three possible routes, timeline and investment range.
Team, governance, environments and project plan. We define who decides what and how fast — the biggest cause of delay in SAP projects is a decision waiting for approval.
Workshops per process comparing your operation to the S/4HANA standard. Every gap becomes a backlog item with an explicit decision: adopt the standard, configure or develop. Customisation only goes in with a business justification.
Configuration, ABAP/Fiori development, data migration and integrated test cycles. We run at least two full test cycles and one acceptance test with key users.
A timed cutover rehearsal, a documented rollback plan and a switchover window agreed with operations. Nobody flips a system in the dark.
Hypercare with the same project team, then a structured handover to support — ours or your internal team, with documentation delivered.
An SAP project that ends with nothing but a working system leaves debt behind.
Process designs, role matrix, functional and technical specifications for everything built. Delivered in editable format, not as a dead PDF.
Key users trained during the project, not in a rushed session the week of go-live. Whoever operates it needs to understand it before the switch.
An SoD matrix designed together with the roles, avoiding the classic rework of discovering access conflicts at the first audit.
We measure real usage per transaction after go-live. A system nobody uses is a failed project, even if it landed on time.
The investment varies mainly with the number of modules, the number of users, the volume of customisations to migrate and the route chosen. A controlled-scope Brownfield costs far less than a multi-country Greenfield. That is why our proposal always comes after the assessment: pricing SAP without knowing the legacy is guesswork. The assessment itself is quick and produces numbers you can defend to your board.
A single-scope Brownfield usually lands between 8 and 14 months. A mid-sized Greenfield, between 12 and 24 months. A roll-out to an additional site, with the template ready, can take 3 to 5 months. The factor that moves these numbers most is not technical: it is how fast the client decides in the fit-to-standard workshops.
Not necessarily. S/4HANA runs on-premise, in private cloud (including RISE with SAP) and in public cloud. The choice depends on your appetite for customisation, the regulatory requirements of your sector and the cost model your company prefers. We assess this without infrastructure-vendor bias.
They go through triage. On average, a meaningful share of the customisations in an old ECC either is no longer used or has become standard functionality in S/4HANA. The assessment inventory classifies each object as keep, adapt, replace with standard or discard — and that usually reduces migration effort significantly.
Yes, and it is not rare. In those cases we first make an independent assessment of the real state of the project: what is genuinely done, what is done on paper and what has to be redone. Only then do we discuss a recovery plan and timeline.
Nem sempre uma solução pronta disponível no mercado consegue atender completamente às necessidades de uma empresa.…
A transformação digital deixou de ser apenas uma tendência para se tornar parte essencial da estratégia das empresas…
O ano de 2027 está se tornando um dos principais marcos para empresas que ainda utilizam SAP ECC.…
A readiness assessment returns three scenarios with timeline and investment range. No commitment to hire the project.